[ExI] tiny martians again

[ablainey at aol.com]

I fully agree. The problems and hardships that 'small people' encounter in their daily lives are all related to the world being designed for us lofty people. In a Mars mission environment, or any other specific extra planetary mission. These problems would be non existent if the mission were designed for small people from the outset. Mind, you in space it doesn't really matter what level the light switch is at, when everyone is floating around!
I do have a couple of concerns about?a short people only mission. Can we find enough of them willing to take the risk? I am fairly sure that life has made them pretty hardy and up for just about any challenge, but it may smack of 'Hey short stuff, we want to blast you into space on a potentially life threatening mission rather than one of the good ole boys, Mainly cos you're cheap!. Wadda ya say?"

Secondly, if the mission were to be a long term or permanent affair with mixed sexes, then what happens when the first human martian (Marman? Hutian?) offspring turn out to be full sized? which is perfectly?possible. Granted, that is a problem that may present itself way down the line, and will most likely score very low on the problems list.

As a side note, I have noticed that in many alien abduction accounts, The abductee's speak about the stereotypical greys and also very short stature helpers. Perhaps?the greys thought about the an equivalent small people solution a few millennia before us? Perhaps a thoughtful abductee could bare this in mind next time they get whisked away to beta reticuli and ask if the greys?if the small ones are a result of?a cost cutting exercise? LOL

Alex
?

-----Original Message-----
From: spike <spike66 at att.net>
To: 'ExI chat list' <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Sent: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 4:54
Subject: [ExI] tiny martians again

?



    Subject: Re: [ExI] tiny martians again
    
    
    ...I once had a beautiful co-worker from the former East Germany and
she was convinced that dwarfs had smaller brains and were generally the
intellectual inferiors of "full-sized" people...John Grigg



John, I have a biker buddy she should meet.  This very short man is a
mechanical technician who modified a motorcycle to fit his frame.  His trunk
is not so different from an ordinary person, but he has extremely short arms
and legs.  He fitted a smaller rear wheel, installed low profile tires,
modifed the suspension fore and aft using shortened springs and compensated
by using higher damping and higher spring rates, cut away part of the rear
fender to allow it to come down closer to the rear tire, removed nearly all
of the padding from the front of the seat so that when at a stoplight, he
moves forward, straddling the frame.  The frame is two parallel bars
foreward of the seat and aft of the tank, so he can straddle the bars
without damage to his manliness.  With all those individual solutions, the
front of the seat is only 26 inches from the pavement.  He built up this
bike mostly by himself, using mostly his own ideas.  But he still needed
about two inches to touch down.  I might have come up with all these ideas,
but he had one more idea I would never have thought of: he modified his
riding boots with extensions.

On a group ride he was wearing them, so I had to ask: Guy, how do you walk
in those things?  He said: Well... these boots ain't made for walking.  You
know what I had to say: ...and that's just what they won't do...  

You need to be nearly fifty to get that joke.

Regarding little people with smaller brains, I would argue thus: small
people evidently have sufficient brain matter up front to do what large
people do.  

At the start of WW2 (no I wasn't there dammit) the men went off in large
numbers to fight the war, so people (mostly women) poured into the aircraft
factories as replacements.  A group of little people who couldn't be
soldiers went into the factories, where they found a perfect job: they were
small enough to climb into the tail sections and other tiny spaces to
install and inspect control cables.  

Ordinarily workers came into the factories in the early war years with no
experience of any kind, so they were taught a skill: riveting, welding or
soldering for instance.  After they mastered a skill, they were given a
raise to the second tier.  A few of the workers already had a specific skill
when they started, so they started at a higher pay.  The midgets already had
a specific skill: climbing into tight spaces.  So Lockheeed, Doouglas and
Booeing did the logical thing: started them at the second tier.  I can
imagine that did wonders for their self esteem, especially considering that
ordinary sized people could never be trained into those positions: they were
too big.

A PBS special had an interview in which the little people commented that
these were some of the happiest years of their lives: they had been
chronically underemployed, some finding work with the circus, in the movies,
or in travelling comedy shows etc.  But when the war started, they were a
valuable asset for the war effort.  

When we do the numbers and realize how much more mission we can do with how
much less rocket, it looks to me all of the Mars missions should be
undertaken by these valuable specially-abled little persons.

spike


_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat


________________________________________________________________________
AOL's new homepage has launched. Take a tour at http://info.aol.co.uk/homepage/ now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20080417/e0833ad3/attachment.html>