[ExI] the formerly rich and their larvae, was: Impressive book: Farewell to Alms
korpios at korpios.com
Tue Feb 5 15:44:07 UTC 2008
On 2/5/08, Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Many people in industrialised
> countries manage to have ten times as many children as they currently
I couldn't quite parse that one; s/manage/could manage/ ?
> Sperm donors are usually paid for their trouble, rather than
> bidding for the opportunity to father multiple offspring at a huge
> discount to the cost incurred doing it the usual way. Dictators who
> have shown no compunction in killing millions of their own people have
> never attempted to use reproductive technologies to forcibly conceive
> millions of children.
Well, yeah ... they're male. ^_^ The dictator scenario only makes
sense if he wants to *have sex* with thousands of women; reproduction
still wouldn't be his goal, but rather a side-effect (as with males in
> But the goal isn't reproduction as such, since otherwise the above
> scenarios would be commonplace. Rather, the goal is to obtain a cute
> baby to raise and love. Reproduction is a side-effect of this as much
> as it is a side-effect of having a sexual drive.
"Obtain a cute baby" sounds like "reproduce". ;-) But from a genetic
standpoint, yes, there's a distinction; we're just vehicles, and we
aren't actively talking about getting our *genes* into new babies.
The "obtain a cute baby" goal is still fairly flexible at
circumventing birth control (by simple virtue of causing the female to
(This discussion makes me *very* happy that I've permanently
dead-ended my genes' quest ... well, aside from the copies in my
siblings, assuming *they* reproduce, I suppose.) ^_^
More information about the extropy-chat