[ExI] Many Worlds (was: A Simulation Argument)

[Damien Broderick]

At 12:36 PM 1/9/2008 -0500, John K Clark wrote:

>I think you're mixing Feynman's Sum-over-histories and Everett's many
>worlds.

I'm assuming they cash out the same way, in the respect I mentioned. 
(Maybe they don't.)

>Everett was talking about the entire universe splitting, Feynman
>was not

Some commentators deny that Everett's model meant entire universes 
(due to relativistic constraints, if for no other reason). It's never 
been clear to me just what they *do* mean, though--what the boundaries are.

Damien Broderick