[ExI] "an aboriginal human from 70,000 B.C."

[Lee Corbin]

Damien writes

> Lee wrote:
> 
>> What can the government do except forcibly integrate the
>> families into separate cities as far as apart as possible?
>> It should have been done a long time ago.
> 
> <incredulous outburst in response deleted>

Hey, I am *very* open to ideas!  Please, please try to answer
the question I posed there, if your natural outburst is suppressed.
(You know vastly more about the problem than do I.)

I did *not* say that the solution I suggest would be nice or good.
In my earlier post where I mentioned the same thing, I thought I
had made it clear that I didn't like this one bit, but that all the
alternatives looked worse.

After all, you're the one who posted what's below.

(Or do some people just like to endlessly complain, without 
offering any ideas about what to do?  That explains a post
or two of someone else's here tonight.)

Lee

_______________________________________________________

Damien wrote

##<http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22896877-601,00.html>
> 
> No jail for rape of girl, 10
> 
> NINE males who pleaded guilty last month to gang-raping a 10-year-old 
> girl at the Aurukun Aboriginal community on Cape York have escaped a 
> prison term, with the sentencing judge saying the child victim 
> "probably agreed" to have sex with them.
> 
> Cairns-based District Court judge Sarah Bradley ordered that the six 
> teenage juveniles not even have a conviction recorded for the 2005 
> offence, and that they be placed on a 12-month probation order.
> 
> Judge Bradley sentenced three men over the age of consent of 16 - 
> aged 17, 18 and 26 - to six months' imprisonment, with the sentence 
> suspended for 12 months.
> 
> Because the 28-day appeal period has expired, the sentences cannot be altered.
> 
> Judge Bradley said from her Cairns home yesterday that she considered 
> the sentences "appropriate" in the case because they were the 
> penalties asked for by the Crown prosecutor.
> 
> =========================
> from an email exchange last year following the court case:
> 
> ========
>>So ... they don't have any minimum age of consent?
> 
> I'm sure they must have. But it's a hierarchical male-brutalized 
> sub-society at the end of its tether.
> 
> The article depicts a terminal "behavioral sink" with the top rats 
> picking with impunity on the lower rats, but everyone seething with 
> barely controlled fury, ready to kill each other, so the judge tried 
> not to inflame the brain-damaged lunatics. Not good law, but maybe 
> workable politics.