[ExI] wtf? (literally)

[Damien Broderick]

At 03:44 PM 9/4/2008 -0600, Mike LaTorra wrote:

>this particular case would be especially interesting if Duchovny had 
>been under legal threat for being, shall we say, too interested in 
>doing what comes naturally.

All the rumors on the web assert that his wicked sin was pr0n-based, 
not infidelity. Difficult to see how that could be construed as 
subject to any court order--unless he was viewing *illegal* material, 
in which case "going into rehab" seems too lenient for the current 
Zeitgeist even for celebs.

Sorry to bring up what is surely a private and embarrassing matter 
for the poor feller; I was just struck by the strange terminology and 
its apparent legal implications.

Damien Broderick