[ExI] Yet another health care debate
thespike at satx.rr.com
Mon Sep 22 18:21:30 UTC 2008
At 12:10 PM 9/22/2008 +0000, Tom Nowell wrote an excellent open-eyed
summary of UK Health system.
I found that fascinating, Tom. Thanks!
To my inexpert eye, having some passing familiarity as a client of
only Oz and US medical systems, it looks rather as if the worst case
scenarios/worst fail points Tom identifies in the UK system are the
very aspects that USians point to with pride in their own setup:
>some hospitals have tried to outsource everything possible, leading
>to lower standards of cleanliness (from using cheapest bidder
>cleaners) which conflicts with the clinical need to avoid
>hospital-acquired infections, less flexible meals for patients
>(cheapest bidder caterers) which can conflict with individual
>patient needs, slower laboratory test results (sending lab tests
>offsite to a cheaper lab across town rather than having a lab onsite).
The market at work! Hallelujah! (Or am I misunderstanding the
invisible hand again?)
>In the NHS, you either have to be totally public funded, or totally
>private funded. ... People with cancer have offered to pay for the
>cost of the drugs, only to be told that they will then have to fund
>the rest of the treatment costs as well if they do - so they would
>have to pay the hospital costs, pay for the doctor to administer the
>drugs, and the rest, all massively increasing the cost.
Not sure about this one, but here in TX I pay a lot of insurance
against the chance of catastrophic illness or accident, and have to
do all the above as a matter of course (since I'm not a derelict
throwing myself on the mercy of the ER). Hallelujah!
Would be interesting to see equivalent point-by-point rundowns on the
US system/s, Oz, etc.
More information about the extropy-chat