[ExI] What's wrong with Maher's Religulous?
John Grigg
possiblepaths2050 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 22:43:29 UTC 2009
Fred Moulton wrote:
>So to criticize either one for not being a proper comparative religion
>documentary is either silly or stupid.
Maher presents himself enough in the "documentary mode" that he is
deserving of criticism. He doesn't have to present things at the
academic or going for the Oscar level to try to be at least somewhat
balanced/fair.
Dagon Gmail wrote:
Its halfway between documentary and comedy act. Yet another piece of
evidence movies have become too 'light' to go through all the effort
of renting or going into town to see it.
>>
Thank you.
John
On 4/9/09, Dagon Gmail <dagonweb at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/movie/2385-Religulous_2008.html
>
> Its halfway between documentary and comedy act. Yet another piece of
> evidence movies have become too
> 'light' to go through all the effort of renting or going into town to see
> it. Its funny, but not half as funny as
> cartman laying down the law.
>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list