[ExI] Amazon is Beginning to Delist Some Books

[Emlyn]

2009/4/13 Olga Bourlin <fauxever at sprynet.com>:
> Being a great fan of the First Amendment, I am sorry to see this trend.
>
> http://therumpus.net/2009/04/amazon-delisting-books/
>
> Olga


http://blog.seattlepi.com/amazon/archives/166384.asp?from=blog_last3

AmazonFail: An inside look at what happened
(seattlepi.com, byline is Andrea James, "News Gatherer". what the?)

I've spoken to an Amazon.com employee who works closely with the
systems involved in the glitch. The employee asked me not to share his
name because of company policies on talking with the media.

On Sunday afternoon at least 20 Amazon.com employees were paged
alerting them that items, possibly many, were incorrectly being
flagged as adult. The employees also received links to the Twitter
discussion AmazonFail.

Thousands of people were angry that gay-themed books had disappeared
from Amazon's sales rankings and search algorithms. The number of
Tweets on Sunday afternoon that had the term "AmazonFail" surpassed
even those with the words "Easter" or "Jesus."

By this time, Amazon.com had upgraded the problem to Sev-1.
(Amazon.com breaks down its operational issues in terms of severity
levels. Sev-3 means a problem affects a single user. Sev-2 is a
problem that affects a company, or a lot of people. Sev-1 is reserved
for the most critical operational issues and often are sent up the
management chain to the senior vice president level.)

"People got pulled away from their Easter thing when this whole thing
broke," the employee said. "It was just a screwup."

Amazon.com employees are on call 24/7, and many began working on the
problem from home. It didn't take much digging to realize that there
was a data error.

Amazon managers found that an employee who happened to work in France
had filled out a field incorrectly and more than 50,000 items got
flipped over to be flagged as "adult," the source said. (Technically,
the flag for adult content was flipped from 'false' to 'true.')

"It's no big policy change, just some field that's been around forever
filled out incorrectly," the source said.

Amazon employees worked on the problem well past midnight, and then
handed it over to an international team, he said.

Seattle-based Amazon.com sells millions of items, so the 57,000
affected represent just a tiny portion of the company's selection. But
Amazon's perception problem was enormous, and aggravated by the
company's official description of the problem as a "glitch."

The source wanted it known that mistakes do happen at Amazon.com --
they're all human.

"Most everyone at one point who works with catalog systems has broken
some piece of the catalog," the source said.

In fact, employees sometimes tell war stories over lunch where the
conversation can go something like this: "Oh yeah, I remember when I
broke a portion of France and all this stuff happened."

Usually, mistakes get corrected pretty quickly, the source said.

And there you have it from a source who watched the situation unfold
within his company and on Twitter.

An Amazon spokesman was not immediately available for comment.


-- 
Emlyn

http://emlyntech.wordpress.com - coding related
http://point7.wordpress.com - ranting
http://emlynoregan.com - main site