[ExI] File sharers leak government secrets
painlord2k at libero.it
Sun Aug 2 20:33:28 UTC 2009
BillK ha scritto:
> You make the rather optimistic assumption that people *can* be
> educated about computer viruses, spyware, keyloggers, rootkits, web
> bugs, browser hijacks, trojans, etc. People still send money to our
> Nigerian friends, you know.
If people can not be educated, Is there any way they can be deterred by
a law wrote in a book they probably don't know exist?
Do you know all and every laws concerning you?
Do you follow them all?
> Legislation is often a brute force technology that says - 'Just don't
> do it!' If you wonder why, then you can take the time to educate
There are laws against the use of drugs, we see how much they work.
There are laws against killing fellows humans, we see how well they work.
There are laws against many behaviors, we see how much they work.
Could you educate yourself about the "False Ideas of Utility" of Cesare
>> ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS By CESARE BECCARIA Italy — 1764
>> Chapter 40 Of False Ideas of Utility
>> A principal source of errors and injustice are false ideas of
>> utility. For example: that legislator has false ideas of utility who
>> considers particular more than general conveniencies, who had rather
>> command the sentiments of mankind than excite them, and dares say to
>> reason, `Be thou a slave'; who would sacrifice a thousand real
>> advantages to the fear of an imaginary or trifling inconvenience; who
>> would deprive men of the use of fire for fear of their being burnt,
>> and of water for fear of their being drowned; and who knows of no
>> means of preventing evil but by destroying it.
>> The laws of this nature are those which forbid to wear arms,
>> disarming those only who are not disposed to commit the crime which
>> the laws mean to prevent. Can it be supposed, that those who have the
>> courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, and the most
>> important of the code, will respect the less considerable and
>> arbitrary injunctions, the violation of which is so easy, and of so
>> little comparative importance? Does not the execution of this law
>> deprive the subject of that personal liberty, so dear to mankind and
>> to the wise legislator? and does it not subject the innocent to all
>> the disagreeable circumstances that should only fall on the guilty?
>> It certainly makes the situation of the assaulted worse, and of the
>> assailants better, and rather encourages than prevents murder, as it
>> requires less courage to attack unarmed than armed persons.
>> It is a false idea of utility that would give to a multitude of
>> sensible beings that symmetry and order which inanimate matter is
>> alone capable of receiving; to neglect the present, which are the
>> only motives that act with force and constancy on the multitude for
>> the more distant, whose impressions are weak and transitory, unless
>> increased by that strength of imagination so very uncommon among
>> mankind. Finally, that is a false idea of utility which, sacrificing
>> things to names, separates the public good from that of individuals.
>> There is this difference between a state of society and a state of
>> nature, that a savage does no more mischief to another than is
>> necessary to procure some benefit to himself: but a man in society is
>> sometimes tempted, from a fault in the laws, to injure another
>> without any prospect of advantage. The tyrant inspires his vassals
>> with fear and servility, which rebound upon him with double force,
>> and are the cause of his torment. Fear, the more private and domestic
>> it is, the less dangerous is it to him who makes it the instrument of
>> his happiness; but the more it is public, and the greater number of
>> people it affects, the greater is the probability that some mad,
>> desperate, or designing person will seduce others to his party by
>> flattering expectations; and this will be the more easily
>> accomplished as the danger of the enterprise will be divided amongst
>> a greater number, because the value the unhappy set upon their
>> existence is less, as their misery is greater.
> Naturally experts will then object to the law cramping their freedom,
> but that's socialism - for the greater good of all and to protect
> the weak and feeble-minded.
Are you speaking about yourself? Or do you think to be a better man than
others you would like to rule?
> (And you shouldn't diss world government, either. We know you'll like
> it when we're finished). ;)
Well, if the world government finish you all, it will have done
something good. But it will not be enough to prevent us from destroying it.
More information about the extropy-chat