[ExI] some inneresting comments of the Krugman graph

Rafal Smigrodzki rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Wed Aug 5 14:18:31 UTC 2009

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Damien Sullivan<phoenix at ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:

> Why is this better than trying to get off fossil carbon and removing
> CO2 from the atmosphere?

### Dealing with the theoretical downsides of high CO2 costs pennies
per capita, eliminating anthropogenic CO2 costs many trillions of
dollars, plus CO2 has significant positive effects on agriculture.

Carbon mitigation is just a religion, going strongly against economic
calculation and common sense.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list