[ExI] pat condell's latest subtle rant

[spike]

> ...On Behalf Of jameschoate at austin.rr.com
> Subject: Re: [ExI] pat condell's latest subtle rant
> 
> ---- spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote: 
>  
> > John this approach lumps all religious memes together.  I would 
> > counter-propose classifying religious thoughtspace into two broad
> > categories: those which suggest killing unbelievers and 
> those which do not.
> 
> Useless distinction really, the question rests too much on 
> political practicality and not ethical bedrock. A more 
> practical and pragmatic distinction is whether the religion 
> recognizes cosmological transcendence. James Choate


Of course, but the reason I am interested in that particular distinction is
that I wish to avoid those who want to kill me.  If they do not wish to slay
me, I care not if they recognize transcendance, or what they believe, or if
they believe anything.  I have but one life to live, and I do not wish to
have it shortened by a McDawnstor*.

spike


*McDawnstor = Man-caused Disasterist, Associated With No Specific Theology
Or Religion.