[ExI] Tolerance
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Dec 10 07:20:09 UTC 2009
On 12/10/2009 12:59 AM, Giulio Prisco (2nd email) wrote:
> Fundamentalists, of any persuasions, are those intolerant bigots who
> cannot accept that others favor ideas and lifestyles different from
> their own.
But "fundamentalist" already has a customary denotation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism
<The term fundamentalism was originally coined to describe a narrowly
defined set of beliefs that developed into a movement within the
Protestant community of the United States in the early part of the 20th
century, and that had its roots in the Fundamentalist-Modernist
Controversy of that time. Until 1950, there was no entry for
fundamentalism in the Oxford English Dictionary;[5] the derivative
fundamentalist was added only in its second 1989 edition.[6]
The term has since been generalized to mean strong adherence to any set
of beliefs in the face of criticism or unpopularity, but has by and
large retained religious connotations.>
So you might be better off using the term "bigot" or even "intolerant
bigot" which seems to have a less narrow flavor.
It's odd that you feel no discomfort in describing "their atheism, which
they make a
religion of," since that characterization in itself seems to be a
disparagement of religion. For those people who approve of religion,
this might sound like an endorsement rather than a condemnation--unless
the religious person is a sectarian fundamentalist, of course.
Damien Broderick
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list