[ExI] Scientists Behaving Badly
JOSHUA JOB
nanite1018 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 13 07:01:06 UTC 2009
> This new article is one of the best I've seen on the CRU emails
> controversy, especially in the way it distinguishes between the
> players and their attitudes:
>
> http://www.aei.org/article/101395
I had been having trouble getting a good idea of everything that had
happened with this whole Climategate thing, thank you for sending out
this great summary!
Honestly, it is a travesty that these "scientists" will end up doing
so much harm to what is an actually important area of science (if not
in the short-to-medium term). The three, Mann and the two others that
were abundantly poltiical, need to be driven out of the field by the
rest with hockey sticks, haha.
And, seeing this, it makes me far more skeptical about man-made global
warming/climate change than I was before all this. I believed,
honestly, that scientists do not do this, that we (and I say we
because I am a physics major and intend to be a physicist) were
better. And that the ones that behave badly couldn't go very far,
because the mechanisms of the profession would correct them out of
existence. But apparently not, at least in some cases.
I didn't realize that natural scientists were "at least" liberal (in
the American sense). I realized man of them were (I was a socialist
for a long time because I wanted the economy to be planned and
organized like machines and instruments, oh how foolish I was). But I
didn't realize it was nearly universal. Interesting. Well, at least I
won't be part of that "group-think"!
Joshua Job
nanite1018 at gmail.com
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list