[ExI] Charity vs. the Dole/was Re: Private and government R&D [was Health care in the USA]
painlord2k at libero.it
Wed Jul 22 10:14:31 UTC 2009
Dan ha scritto:
> On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:03:30 AM Stathis Papaioannou
> stathisp at gmail.com wrote:
>> 2009/7/21 Mirco Romanato <painlord2k at libero.it>:
>>> Rafal Smigrodzki ha scritto:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Mirco
>>>> Romanato<painlord2k at libero.it> wrote:
>>>>> Stathis Papaioannou ha scritto:
>>>>>> 2009/7/17 Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Charity won't reliably cover everyone.
>>>> ### I didn't write that.
>>> He didn't write that government plans will reliably cover
>>> everyone. He did?
>> It was I who wrote it, not Rafal as the >>>'s suggest.
> The >s don't reveal things correctly here, but no matter.
> That charity won't reliably cover everyone remains to be proved and
> depends on what's meant by "reliably." Under a coercive system, no
> everyone is necessarily covered either. Again, coercive systems don't
> escape the scarcity problem.
For the people talking about detachment from reality, I read today that
in England a young 18 year old was denied the liver transplant because
he have no time to prove to stay 6 months away from alcohol. He died before.
This from the NHS of England, that is a socialized service, governed by
socialists (Labour) for 15 years.
More information about the extropy-chat