[ExI] The Death Toll Imbalance in the Mideast War

painlord2k at libero.it painlord2k at libero.it
Thu Jun 11 18:15:19 UTC 2009

Il 11/06/2009 19.39, Stefano Vaj ha scritto:
> 2009/6/11 painlord2k at libero.it<painlord2k at libero.it>:
>> But Saddam was never a US supported dictator.
>> It was a national-socialist dictator supported by USSR mainly.
> One wonders if being a socialist and a nationalist at the same time
> automatically qualifies you as a National-socialist in the 1933-1945
> German sense, were it just for rhetorical purposes... :-)

Well, it invaded neighbours states, it killed its people, it gassed 
civilians of a different ethnicity for their ethnicity, it did ethnic 
cleansing, tortured, killed, was leaded by a dictator, the economy was 
under state control. Saddam used Stalin as a model and the Baath Party 
was founded as a version of the German Nazi Party.

I think that if it don't qualify for NS in the 1933-45 sense, it is very 
Or maybe can only White Europeans be national socialists in the 
1933-1945 way and the others are only US puppets?

-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release Date: 06/11/09 05:53:00

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list