[ExI] Protected Elites
stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Sat May 16 00:15:29 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:25 PM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a reference to the Forbes rich list of 2007.
> They found 946 billionaires, of which 60% made their own fortunes.
I am not really referring to "billionaires" as opposed to upper
middle-class, but rather to the fact that upper middle class
perpetuates itself, especially in Europe.
In other terms, if you are rich below a certain threshold *and*
stupid, you can usually find consultants protecting for you your
wealth and doing the necessary in order to have your children have a
very good chance to remain in the same class, partly through
inheritance of family wealth, partly through education and above all
On the other hand, I suspect that dramatic upward social mobility has
more frequently to do with "marrying up", becoming a show-biz star, or
becoming a sport champion, and more rarely with your genius as an
entrepreneur or an inventor.
Of course, my first-hand experience is Europe, but my impression is
that also in the US social Darwinism remains more of a myth than most
of its partisans and opponents may think.
More information about the extropy-chat