sjatkins at mac.com
Mon May 25 08:15:00 UTC 2009
On May 23, 2009, at 2:32 PM, John Grigg wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com
> > wrote:
> Most of the people posting here seem to have no notion how depraved
> it is to speak of human bodies as "meat".
> I wish you'd all get over this nerdish affectation.
> Meat is dead, hacked-up flesh. My body isn't meat, it's me, and
> yours isn't meat either. It's a living person. The jeering
> philistinism of calling our bodies "meat" reminds me of insensitive
> oafs who disdain van Vogh's paintings as "daubing" or Shakespeare as
> a "scribbler".
> Thank you, Damien. I remember a conversation I had in the
> Immortality Institute chatroom where a 19 year-old guy told me he
> couldn't wait to escape his meatsicle body! Only 19 and in good
> health... Yes, we need some of that Enlightenment era love and
> admiration of the human body.
> My own view of transhumanism is about developing technology to
> perfect the power and beauty of the flesh and form we have now. A
> century hence people will have beauty and vitality that Renaissance
> era sculptors and painters could only dream about.
Not very interesting to me personally. Oh, I would put on various
human bodies as the mood struck me but I would consider it failure to
be limited to only one or even to only classical human form, no matter
how healthy and beautiful.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat