[ExI] Restructuring executive compensation
Brian Atkins
brian at posthuman.com
Sat May 30 20:28:40 UTC 2009
Max, Bill is right that it's proven beyond any doubts at this point in history
that rules just will not stand in the way of the economic cycle. I mean we're
living through the aftermath of exactly the kind of rule perverting stuff Bill
is talking about. Here's a good example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass-Steagall_Act#Repeal_of_the_Act
So, let's get this straight. In order for Citi and the other banks to get the
rope to hang themselves with, all of these people had to willingly go along with
getting this law changed: bank CEOs, bank Boards, shareholders, Congress, US
President. And they all went along with it happily. And honestly for myself,
back in 1999 this wasn't a blip on my radar either. Laws dating back to the
1930s?? What possible use could that have in the New Economy.
In the aftermath now, sure we will make a bunch of new rules to shore things
back up, and for a while it will be improved, but the cycle will continue
turning. As long as it is driven by human minds then eventually it will almost
certainly repeat.
And by the way, attempting to smooth it out typically just ends up making things
worse down the road. See Hyman Minsky, "stability leads to instability":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyman_Minsky#Financial_theory
If the government/Fed had let things deflate properly during the last recession
instead of smoothing that out then we never would have had this huge housing and
debt bubble. Or at least it wouldn't have been so big and damaging.
Your best bet as long as we are in a human-driven economy is to expect the
historic cycle to repeat, and learn to profit from it.
--
Brian Atkins
Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
http://www.singinst.org/
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list