[ExI] Is unemployment the future?
painlord2k at libero.it
Tue Nov 3 17:28:09 UTC 2009
BillK ha scritto:
> On 11/3/09, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Ah ha! I see Eugen understands what is going on.
> The official unemployment figures are massaged to meaninglessness by
> the politicians. That's why I quoted the food stamps figures. So far
> as I can tell these figures are just straight totals and are not
> adjusted for public consumption.
> Even GDP stats nowadays are mostly useless. Recovery??? That's a joke
> - except for bankers' bonuses.
> Also, many people 'officially' employed are on short time and have
> very low take-home pay. Thus they become eligible for food stamps,
> which shoots upwards.
> It is not only computer tech that is the problem. Production has been
> outsourced to China and the Far East. India provides helpdesks and
> call-centres, cars come from Japan, etc. etc. The first world jobs are
> in government or the remaining services that are not yet transferred
> In some areas of the UK, half the population is employed by the
> national or local government or the national health service. They
> provide services to the other half who are on unemployment benefit or
> permanent disability benefit.
> Is this the wonderful future we anticipate?
You didn't, but it is not a surprise.
Permanent disability benefits are a way to buy votes.
Often they are given fraudulently.
Government jobs are a way to buy votes. Often they use near all the
budget to pay for the employees and there is no money to let them do
their intended jobs.
I bet that the areas where government jobs are larger are the areas
where economic development lag or is negative.
More government jobs make harder to produce real jobs because the
government jobs need to be funded by taxes paid by real jobs.
So, marginally employable people is put out of real jobs by high taxes
and government step in for "help" them with doles or fake jobs that
raise the tax burden for others and put other workers out of their jobs.
Lowering taxes is the best way to create jobs.
In the same way, pegging the currency to a commodity (like gold) would
prevent money creation and the stealth stealing of value from people
living from their wages and without hard assets like real estate.
This would force interest rates much higher than now, forcing people and
government to spend less and reduce lending. But would prevent bubbles
and malinvestment (allocation of resources in only apparently
remunerative projects). It would kill many financial jobs in the same
time, as these can exist only with near zero interests rates
But I bet these solutions will not like you.
-------------- next part --------------
Nessun virus nel messaggio in uscita.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 9.0.698 / Database dei virus: 270.14.47/2478 - Data di rilascio: 11/03/09 08:36:00
More information about the extropy-chat