[ExI] Ants for spike! Dawkins and Wilson
Max More
max at maxmore.com
Sun Nov 15 18:23:12 UTC 2009
>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/weekinreview/12wade.html?_r=1
>
>The Evolution of the God Gene
>Nicholas Wade
Thanks for posting that, spike.
What bothered me about Wade's article is the quick assumption that
evolution has directly favored religious belief. It seems at least as
likely to me that evolutionary pressures have led to certain general
cognitive and emotional capabilities (including the ability to create
narratives, and a desire for certainty) that make it easy for most
humans to construct religious beliefs.
The distinction between a direct evolutionary effect and the more
derivative effect could be significant. If the latter is the case, we
should have more critical tools for resisting the religious impulse
-- or at least its irrational and destructive aspects.
Which reminds of something else that bothered me in Wade's piece: He
uses "religion" as if it were a simple phenomenon, rather than a
fuzzy collection of beliefs, practices, and communities. Evolutionary
pressures probably have different degrees of influence for difference
components of "religion". I don't see why, for instance, (a) shared
beliefs strengthening social bonds should be treated exactly the same
as (b) worship of and obeisance to a higher power.
Max
-------------------------------------
Max More, Ph.D.
Strategic Philosopher
Extropy Institute Founder
www.maxmore.com
max at maxmore.com
-------------------------------------
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list