[ExI] Alcock on Bem in Skeptical Inquirer
thespike at satx.rr.com
Sat Dec 4 23:59:42 UTC 2010
On 12/4/2010 5:30 PM, BillK wrote:
> Well, surely his original description must have been very badly
> written to allow interpretations that he disagrees with so strongly?
> Perhaps he should do a complete rewrite.
Alcock is (as your people put it, BillK) all cock and bull. Unlike his
colleague Hyman. To see what kind of deceptive claptrap his "context"
section is, have a careful look at Dr. Radin's response:
More information about the extropy-chat