[ExI] Alcock on Bem in Skeptical Inquirer

[Damien Broderick]

On 12/4/2010 5:30 PM, BillK wrote:

> Well, surely his original description must have been very badly
> written to allow interpretations that he disagrees with so strongly?
> Perhaps he should do a complete rewrite.

Alcock is (as your people put it, BillK) all cock and bull. Unlike his 
colleague Hyman. To see what kind of deceptive claptrap his "context" 
section is, have a careful look at Dr. Radin's response:

<http://deanradin.blogspot.com/2010/12/my-comments-on-alcocks-comments-on-bems.html>

Damien Broderick