[ExI] SpaceX launch
eugen at leitl.org
Fri Dec 10 11:27:08 UTC 2010
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Adrian Tymes wrote:
> If one can superheat the fuel anyway, one might as well simply superheat it
> directly to plasma and don't bother reacting it. Unless one includes a
> short-lived fusion reactor as part of the engine, of course.
Your problem is mass. E.g. fusion-enhanced VASIMR would have to
to produce enough additionals thrust to overcome the added
I personally think that tracked beam propulsion (in the weaker
form, via e.g. a rectenna array feeding a VASIMR unit) will win
by virtue of leaving (most of) the drive at home.
> Then again, that's "short-lived" as in "approximately 10 minutes", whereas with
> modern experimental fusion reactors, 10 seconds is considered a very long
> reaction. (Which makes me wonder how they think they'll get it to commercial
> practicality, which requires sustained power output for hours at least. I also
> can't help but wonder if engineering for extremely short reactions is part of
> the reason why big fusion reactors have not produced progress
> commensurate with their expense.)
Speculation without knowledge is rarely useful.
> Might anyone know of experiments in long duration plasma containment?
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat