[ExI] cure for global warming is working
thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Dec 23 00:04:13 UTC 2010
Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
>>> >> And most climate
>>> >> scientists will hem and haw when asked privately rather than honestly
>>> >> look you in the eye and say they know there is detectable
>>> >> anthropogenic carbon dioxide impact on current climate.
>>> >> ### Thanks to CO2 fertilization existing plant varieties are now able
>>> >> to function better under dry and hot conditions which explains the
>>> >> shrinking of deserts observed especially in the last 30 years.
>> > I'm confused, Rafal. You mean the fertilization by the extra CO2 that
>> > doesn't exist? Or it does exist but can't possibly affect the climate?
> ### Is there anything in what I wrote that would justify your
Obviously I thought so, or I wouldn't have asked.
> Did you get the impression that I think CO2 concentration
> is stable or that it is not a greenhouse gas?
Yes. If not, why do climate scientists avoid your eye and hem and haw
when you ask if CO2 is increasing and acting as a greenhouse gas by
What am I missing here?
More information about the extropy-chat