[ExI] Newbie Question: Consciousness and Intelligence
stathisp at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 09:28:24 UTC 2010
On 15 February 2010 11:46, Gordon Swobe <gts_2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> It seems to me a digital simulation of a person, i.e., an upload existent on a computer, will have no more reality than does a digital movie of that person on a computer today. Depictions of things, digital or otherwise, do not equal the things they depict no matter how complete and realistic the depiction.
> This does not preclude the possibility that a complete digital description of a person might serve as a reliable blueprint for reconstructing that person in material form, but I see that as a separate question.
>> Sure, somebody may refuse his conclusion for philosophical
>> and ultimately arbitrary reasons
> Come the singularity, some people will lose their grips on reality and find themselves believing such absurdities as that digital depictions of people have real mental states. A few lonely philosophers of my stripe will try in vain to restore their sanity. :)
You keep repeating this as a fact but you don't explain why a digital
depiction of a person won't have real mental status. A pile of bricks
can duplicate the mass of a person; a car can duplicate the speed of a
person; an artificial joint can duplicate the function of a human's
joint. These devices are all very different from the the thing they
are copying. Why should the mind resist copying in anything other than
the original substrate?
More information about the extropy-chat