[ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled
stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 09:45:53 UTC 2010
On 21 February 2010 07:19, Christopher Luebcke <cluebcke at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I was actually looking for independently verifiable evidence of intentional forgery, not a list of accusations that anybody with a keyboard could make. I must presume that you're not actually interested in providing such, because you couldn't possibly believe that the response you gave would sway anybody who didn't already agree with your point of view.
This is a common misconception. Forgery tells us something on the
sociology (and possibly the ethics) of science in a given society at a
given time, does not tell anything at all as to the subject matter.
Unless of course not only false data are exposed, but true, hidden data emerge.
More information about the extropy-chat