[ExI] Meaningless Symbols.
eric at m056832107.syzygy.com
Fri Jan 15 19:38:45 UTC 2010
>I just poured 3 cups of water into a 2 cup jar. Does the fact that it
>stopped accepting water after I'd put in 2 cups and overflowed the rest
>mean it *understands* 3>2? Then I put a 1 foot rule next to a book and
>the 9 matched up with the top of the book. Did the rule *understand* how
>tall the book is?
No, I wouldn't attribute understanding to those objects.
You're not describing the manipulation of symbols here, but of
physical objects. Understanding of symbols is a symbolic operation.
> Computer programs understand nothing more than that.
I'll agree that understanding of zeroness and oneness is a very basic
thing. The adder that encodes that understanding is a very simple
circuit, so it's level of understanding must be very simple.
Your brain is much more complicated, so it can understand much more
>This all reminds me of the behaviorist idiocy of the 1950s.
Sounds like you've got a problem with behaviorist descriptions. Can
More information about the extropy-chat