[ExI] The digital nature of brains.

[John Clark]

On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Gordon Swobe wrote:
> 
> It looks like you [Stathis] agree with the third premise:
> A3: Syntax is neither constitutive of nor sufficient for semantics.' 

If syntax is not only insufficient for meaning but it's not even part of meaning then what good is it? Why do you read this list, or books, or talk to people? 

 John K Clark


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100127/97854371/attachment.html>