[ExI] proton measurement upset

[Mike Dougherty]

2010/7/9 John Clark <jonkc at bellsouth.net>:
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Gregory Jones wrote:
>
> A touch smaller?  4% is huuuge. Did they mean 4 parts per billion?
>
> The old figure for the radius of a proton was 0.8768 femtometers, the new
> figure is 0.8418 femtometers. That's about 4%. Maybe they're wrong but it's
> not junk science, it was in Nature and that's about as good as it gets.

Bullshit.  Nature is a cult.


I can't hit send without a disclaimer - this is the email equivalent
of failing to keep a straight face when telling an absurd lie. :)