[ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled

[Christopher Luebcke]

You wish only to accuse, not to prove. Your attitude speaks for itself and reflects directly on the worth of your opinions.

I have nothing else to add.



________________________________
From: Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com>
To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Sent: Mon, March 1, 2010 10:49:54 AM
Subject: Re: [ExI] Phil Jones acknowledging that climate science isn'tsettled

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Christopher Luebcke <cluebcke at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I must confess that a selection of data points that you find disagreeable doesn't sound like forgery to me.
>
> I further find the fact that you make this accusation without any apparent proof of deliberate forgery slanderous.

### I have reassured myself by extensive reading that deliberate
forgery of climate data is well supported through analysis of the
papers, as well as perusal of additional documents produced by FOIA
requests.

I am not interested in suing anybody.

Do you have any more comments?

Rafal
_______________________________________________
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100301/a02adff7/attachment.html>