[ExI] The atoms red herring. =|
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Tue Nov 16 23:22:46 UTC 2010
On 11/16/2010 4:27 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> ... is mute on metaphysical issues...
>
> Metaphysical?!! Translation: Oooga booga superstition. Dragons,
> demons. devils, angels, ghosts, and goblins.
No, Jeff, no. That's not what "metaphysical" means (and I assume Alan
means it correctly). That's as bad an error as the frequently heard gibe
"I'm not interested in *semantics*" as if "semantics" means game-playing
obfuscation rather than "how strings of signifiers *mean*." It's as bad
an error as supposing that "ideology" means "Marxism." Every assertion,
every model of reality, is metaphysically framed--that is, derives from
or implies some contestable position concerning the being, the entia, of
what the words or model represent.
It's always risky citing Wikipedia, but this has some useful background
on the Aristotelian origin of the term and the way it got screwed up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics
Max might care to throw in some philosophy?
Damien Broderick
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list