[ExI] The grain controversy (was Paleo/Primal health)

Stefano Vaj stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Wed Nov 17 22:12:22 UTC 2010


On 16 November 2010 04:46, <lists1 at evil-genius.com> wrote:
> Summary: there is no evidence that the wild sorghum was processed with any frequency -- nor, more importantly, that it had been processed in a way that would actually give it usable nutritional value (i.e. soaked and cooked, of which there is no evidence for the behavior or associated technology (cooking vessels, baskets) for at least 75,000 more years).

Hey, they may have also licked a few old stones. Weren't they living
in the paleo*lithic* age, after all? :-D

--
Stefano Vaj




More information about the extropy-chat mailing list