[ExI] Hal Lewis' resignation from The American Physical Society
Giulio Prisco
giulio at gmail.com
Sat Oct 9 19:17:33 UTC 2010
Richard, regardless of whether the consensus is real, fake or
whatever, and regardless of 8-4, 9-3, 7-5 or whatever other football
scores, this intense and rude reaction is completely out of place.
I am inclined to think you are too emotionally and politically
invested in this and, by consequence, your opinions on the scientific
side of the issue should be ignored, which I am going to do.
The initial messages were not rude and insulting, yours is. You
deserve the BULLSHIT that you got in reply from Max, to which I will
add mine.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Richard Loosemore <rpwl at lightlink.com> wrote:
> The LACK of a scientific consensus is only perceived by a scientifically
> illiterate, politically motivated group that will use whatever dirty tricks
> it can to pervert the course of normal scientific inquiry.
>
> Or: The jury is "only about 8-4 on this"? Bullshit.
>
>
>
> Richard Loosemore
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list