[ExI] Meta was Psi in a major science journal
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Thu Oct 21 20:21:34 UTC 2010
On 10/21/2010 3:02 PM, Keith Henson wrote:
> It may be hard not to dismiss the subject on evolutionary grounds.
>
> If, for example, animals (including humans) really had precognition,
> even in a weak form and it was based on physical brain structure
> expressed by genes, then it would have developed to a highly advanced
> form the way eyes did starting out as simple detectors of light and
> dark.
Generalized musing of this kind has to yield in the face of accumulated
empirical evidence. The rational approach is to start with the
experimental evidence (which might itself be grounded in anecdotal
claims that are far less robust) and then formulate models that are both
consistent with the specific lab observations and consilient with other
models that have been shown to work pretty well in adjacent domains. I
can remember from the 1970s a brilliantly argued case proving beyond
doubt that neutrinos *could NOT have mass.* Bad luck.
Damien Broderick
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list