[ExI] Meta was Psi in a major science journal.

[John Grigg]

Giulio wrote:
>This is a science topic, not a holy war. If psi exists, sooner or later science will ?>explain it.


Giulio, since you did mention holy war, I will say that the only way
to settle this argument between Damien and John is through trial by
combat!  ; )  But though Damien may look the fragile academic, his
Aussie ancestry is that of killers, rebels, and general troublemakers,
and so John had better watch out! lol


But seriously, to me (and I believe most people) it is a matter of
"basic courtesy" to read a paper that is the core focus of a
discussion thread argument.  John, you are being rude to Damien, and
just plain obstinate in general by not reading the document.  And I
think in a dysfunctional way you enjoy the negative attention!
Sheesh!!!


The two of you should be forced to share a small apartment for a
month, as part of a reality television program...


John


On 10/21/10, Giulio Prisco <giulio at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a science topic, not a holy war. If psi exists, sooner or later
> science will explain it.
>
> --
> Giulio Prisco
> giulio at gmail.com
> (39)3387219799
>
> On Oct 22, 2010 8:11 AM, "Damien Broderick" <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/22/2010 12:26 AM, John Clark wrote: >> Read Bem's paper. > Why? I
> can't imagine learning an...
> Exactly, so your opinion on the topic is worthless.
>
> Why am I "so touchy (defensive)" as Isabelle puts it? For the same reason
> most people on this forum would be, I expect, if we were treated to similar
> know-nothing blather from a "creation scientist." I realize that most list
> readers probably won't see it that way, because they also "know" in advance
> that the topic, rather than the Shove-your-telescope response, is
> preposterous BULLSHIT.
>
> Damien Broderick
>
> _______________________________________________ extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extrop...
>