[ExI] POST-SCARCITY SYMBOLS Launched
santostasigio at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 10 22:58:40 UTC 2010
To me is crazy that we are making this a big issue in 2010. Why the color matter? I know it does because historical reasons but it is not absurd that we are still looking at the race of a president as something that mattered? This shows how backwards we are. Now what about the sex of the president? In which year are we going to comment on the fact we achieved something great because the president is a woman?
--- On Fri, 9/10/10, Keith Henson <hkeithhenson at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Keith Henson <hkeithhenson at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ExI] POST-SCARCITY SYMBOLS Launched
To: "ExI chat list" <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 10:37 AM
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Singularity Utopia
<singularity.utopia at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Many years ago during the height of American slavery nobody would have dreamed a
> Black man would become President of the USA
You gotta be kidding. The man went to Harvard. People come out of
Harvard white no matter what color they might have had when they went
PPS Obama is technically mixed race, not black.
extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat