[ExI] AI Motivation revisited

[Kelly Anderson]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:00:38AM -0600, Kelly Anderson wrote:
>
>> Stefano, you are missing the main point, which is that algorithms
>> continue to improve even after problems are solved. These improvements
>
> Are you familiar with computational complexity theory?

I probably studied it at the University, but I am functionally
illiterate on the topic now.

Probably, it would mean that computation can only be optimized to a
point. :-) That I agree with. I just don't think we know the point at
which "intelligence" emerges. I've seen "intelligent UPS" used in
marketing. I'm sure those UPSs were not "intelligent" in any form we
would recognize.

-Kelly


-Kelly