[ExI] Retrocausal Writing

[Adrian Tymes]

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:34 PM, The Avantguardian
<avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> has anyone else here had any instances where a piece of writing be it a novel, academic paper, or what have you simply seemed to write itself?

*raises hand*

> When this occurs did you ever gett the sense that the finished work was using you as a means to bring it into being?

*keeps hand raised*

> If so might this qualify as evidence of retrocausality?

Nope.  There are different states of "being".  The idea can be fully
formed inside your head - but that's just it: it's _inside your head_.
 Ideas there exist in a different, less solid or "real" form than when
they're in a form that can be transmitted to someone else (such as
once they're written down or spoken).

What's inspiring you is not the actual finished work, though it can
seem like that at first.  Rather, what's inspiring you is the pattern
that you can very easily see how to make into a finished work - so
easy, in fact, that it seems as if you are nothing but a tool for this
pattern's end, the same way you might use a pen or a keyboard.