[ExI] Slow thinking
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Oct 3 15:06:55 UTC 2011
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 09:50:10AM -0700, Keith Henson wrote:
> >>.It would have 10^15 times more memory than a human, and be able to think
> > about 10^15 times more things at the same time than a human. John K Clark
>
> Not impressed. You are talking about something that isn't that far
> off of the present where we have ~10^10 people and with access to
> information on that kind of multiple through the internet.
Solar output output seems good for some 10^24 to 10^25 human equivalents,
and probably at significant speedup to boot.
> Human clock rate is perhaps 200 Hz. I don't know where computers will
Humans have no clock, actually. The time domain of most neural processes
is roughly in ms range, some of maybe slightly lower (particularly, if
you're a bat).
> limit, but we are already GHz rates, if we get up to 200 GHz, latency
How long does your computer take to stream once through its entire main core?
Somewhere between 1-10 Hz. Now add random access. Maybe some 0.1-0.01 Hz.
Now add not mere GBytes, but a data structure loosely equivalent to the
network between your ears. Not so many fHz, now.
> becomes a big problem with maximum dimensions for a brain being in the
> mm range and the subjective time to get a message back from the far
> side of an MBrain is 40,000 years. All of a sudden, galactic
Are you often concerned what happens somewhere in a particular location in
a particular time in Australian outback, or African veldt? Which animals is
munching on that particular blade of grass? Why did that rice sack
topple in a street crossing in Baoshan? You likely don't know, and very likely
don't care.
> communication problems have come to the solar system.
You call it communication, I call it living.
> Power, cooling and speed of light delays all conspire against brains
> or even civilizations being physically large if they are running at
> high clock rates. Round trip to the moon is about 2.5 seconds. At an
> easy million to one subjective speed up, it would take about 29 days
> to get a message back. Even the 60 ms low latency optical fibers from
> New York to London would seem like 16 hours.
>
> It occurred to me just now that this is an alternative answer to the
> Fermi question. Once intelligent life forms start moving into faster
> hardware, it may be that they can't leave their home planet without
> getting hopelessly out of touch with whatever is going on.
I haven't yet heard that particular objection. This week, I mean.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list