[ExI] deathless meat

Adrian Tymes atymes at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 17:44:14 UTC 2011

2011/9/1 Dave Sill <sparge at gmail.com>:
> Where's the make it nutritious step? Just because it's "meat" doesn't mean
> it has all the macronutrients, micronutrients, and characteristics that make
> meat good to eat.

Even if it's junk food, there would still be a large market for it.
And, being a
synthetic food, nutrients could be added without too much expense.

Not that there's nothing to be concerned about here.  Being bloodless, it
would probably "naturally" have a lower iron content, for example.  But the
article noted they're working on adding blood.

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list