[ExI] Conversational rules (and metaconversational games)

Amon Zero amon at doctrinezero.com
Wed Sep 28 10:50:30 UTC 2011

On 28 September 2011 11:41, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is annoying for experts in a subject that they have studied for
> years when the whole subject is casually dismissed. Simplistic
> arguments are assumed correct when the experts have read whole books
> discussing all the ramifications of similar arguments.

Agreed. I've found myself on both sides of that fence a number of times. It
seems to me that this is likely where a database of topics, positions,
arguments & evidence would be very useful: Presumably it would cut down on
casual speculation in thoroughly well-trodden areas.

- A
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20110928/a18e0959/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list