[ExI] pussy riot case
Charlie Stross
charlie.stross at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 09:22:55 UTC 2012
On 20 Aug 2012, at 10:17, Mirco Romanato <painlord2k at libero.it> wrote:
> Il 19/08/2012 22:14, spike ha scritto:
>
> Spike, what about the religious freedom angle?
>
> The Pussy Riot group infringed on the freedom of the people peacefully assembled there to practice their religion.
> More they infringed it in a place technically devoted to it specifically.
This is a red herring, because the *actual* prosecution in Russia was on charges of Hooliganism -- an old Soviet catch-all offense frequently used against political dissidents, which is so broadly drawn it can be used to prosecute just about any behaviour that the agents of the state disapprove of (walking too fast on the sidewalk, wearing a loud shirt in a built-up area, and so on).
(You would also run into the interesting question -- in any similar case in the EU, or USA -- of political free speech rights.)
-- Charlie
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list