[ExI] Should the US fund life-extension research?

[Adrian Tymes]

I know not to which post you refer, so no.  But I would not
be surprised if you have said much the same thing at one
point, perhaps better than I put it.

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Natasha Vita-More <natasha at natasha.cc> wrote:
> Did you build this thread based on my earlier post?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org
> [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 5:39 PM
> To: ExI chat list
> Subject: Re: [ExI] Should the US fund life-extension research?
>
> You know something that works one heck of a lot better than Internet
> petitions?
>
> Writing a short note to your Representative and Senators asking them to back
> life extension research.
>
> Postal mail only.  Yes, a stamp isn't free, but it's cheap.
> Yes, it's a bit less convenient - and that's the point: if it's convenient,
> it convinces no one who matters.
>
> Better if you hand write the letter, but if your handwriting is terrible,
> printing it out and hand signing will suffice.  (So long as it's not a
> letter you copied from someone else.) It only needs to be a paragraph or
> two.
>
>
>
> You know what burns up and wastes a lot of the passion that we could be
> using to actually get stuff done?
>
> Internet petitions.
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat