[ExI] unanimous decision, was: RE: An old skeleton tumbles out of the list closet
spike
spike66 at att.net
Thu Nov 15 22:51:17 UTC 2012
On Behalf Of BillK
Subject: Re: [ExI] unanimous decision, was: RE: An old skeleton tumbles out
of the list closet
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:34 AM, spike wrote:
<snip>
>>... But the critical question is if the number of Johnson and Stein
(et.al) votes in those zero-Romney divisions also went to zero...
>...I have found the Philadelphia county machine results by precinct.
There seem to be a general few votes for Johnson and Stein and write-ins
scattered around, even when Romney is zero.
There are over 1,000 precincts, so it is a case for one of your
spreadsheets, I think.
I stepped through the first 20 or so occurrences of OBAMA to check the
pattern of the numbers and they look realistic to me.
<http://www.campaignscientific.com/Downloads/PhilaElecResults/Unofficial_201
2GeneralResults.txt>
BillK
_______________________________________________
Excellent investigative work BillK.
Quick look so far: most of the divisions which went zero-Romney also went
zero for every other non-Obama candidate as well. The database only lists
Obama, Johnson, Stein and Romney, so I don't know if Barr, Anderson and
Goode fit were on the ballot, apparently not. There were a total of 26
non-Obama votes in those 59 divisions vs 19,605 Obama votes, 10 for Johnson,
15 for Stein and 1 for write-in. 37 divisions were all Obama and no one
else, one division was 1 write-in to 448 Obama, ten divisions had exactly 1
Stein vote and no other non-Obamas, 2 divisions had exactly two Steins and
no other non-Obamas,
8 divisions had exactly 1 Johnson and no other Obamas, one division had
exactly 2 Johnsons and no other non-Obamas. Of the 59 divisions which had
no Romney votes, none had both a Johnson and a Stein. Apparently every
neighborhood is limited to one per customer, or two if the same candidate
appeals to both oddballs.
spike
Ward Division obama/johnson/stein/romney/write-in
totals--> 19605 10 15 0 1
19 14 136 0 0 0 0
47 14 149 0 0 0 0
29 9 202 0 0 0 0
24 16 204 0 0 0 0
32 27 209 0 0 0 0
47 13 220 0 0 0 0
28 15 251 0 0 0 0
11 1 256 0 0 0 0
44 16 259 0 0 0 0
29 7 286 0 0 0 0
32 29 289 0 0 0 0
16 9 296 0 0 0 0
16 13 298 0 0 0 0
12 21 303 0 0 0 0
16 8 308 0 0 0 0
28 10 308 0 0 0 0
16 16 309 0 0 0 0
44 3 309 0 0 0 0
37 12 313 0 0 0 0
28 3 324 0 0 0 0
60 10 326 0 0 0 0
37 5 329 0 0 0 0
38 8 356 0 0 0 0
51 9 358 0 0 0 0
51 27 361 0 0 0 0
60 22 362 0 0 0 0
13 15 375 0 0 0 0
17 2 377 0 0 0 0
51 3 388 0 0 0 0
28 6 389 0 0 0 0
46 15 420 0 0 0 0
10 8 422 0 0 0 0
46 12 435 0 0 0 0
11 19 444 0 0 0 0
3 15 448 0 0 0 1
3 14 488 0 0 0 0
59 2 489 0 0 0 0
49 19 513 0 0 0 0
37 1 152 0 1 0 0
24 9 275 0 1 0 0
32 3 288 0 1 0 0
37 8 308 0 1 0 0
32 25 317 0 1 0 0
6 6 335 0 1 0 0
60 18 404 0 1 0 0
44 2 442 0 1 0 0
38 3 583 0 1 0 0
10 21 585 0 1 0 0
32 13 220 0 2 0 0
36 22 322 0 2 0 0
32 1 206 1 0 0 0
32 20 269 1 0 0 0
16 11 301 1 0 0 0
11 3 309 1 0 0 0
32 19 325 1 0 0 0
38 1 331 1 0 0 0
4 4 407 1 0 0 0
44 1 373 1 1 0 0
60 7 344 2 0 0 0
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list