[ExI] Arkyd
Anders Sandberg
anders at aleph.se
Tue Jun 4 18:56:54 UTC 2013
On 2013-06-04 18:41, Kelly Anderson wrote:
>
> But being in space, you don't get the diffraction of the atmosphere...
> Shouldn't a 20cm space telescope be able to see much more than one on
> the ground?
The resolution of a telescope depends on how wide it is. If you have
several openings far away (like connected telescopes across the globe)
you can get a synthetic aperture that is very hi-res. Atmospheric noise
however blurs everything beyond a certain resolution.
But the *sensitivity* depends on how large the "light bucket" is: the
total area collecting light. 20 cm is not much at all, plenty of
amateurs have that. You can get a better picture by looking longer, but
the signal/noise ratio only grows with the square root of time. So 20 cm
is not going to be doing anything radical compared to existing
telescopes, image-wise.
--
Dr Anders Sandberg
Future of Humanity Institute
Oxford Martin School
Oxford University
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list