[ExI] WSJ Article: "In Defense of CO2"
Tomaz Kristan
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Fri May 10 13:50:44 UTC 2013
> all the other horrendous effects of global warming via pumping CO2
I've failed to see any "horrendous effects" of those, I am very sorry. Show
me just one!
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Tomaz Kristan wrote:
> > Yes! Knowing that more CO2 in the atmosphere means less water need for
> > plants - is just essential. CO2 IS a blessing, in fact!
> >
> >
>
> <
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/05/10/carbon_dioxide_and_global_warming_more_is_not_better.html
> >
>
> Phil Plait opposes the WSJ article.
>
> Main point is that apart from some happy plants, the article ignores
> all the other horrendous effects of global warming via pumping CO2
> into the atmosphere.
>
>
> BillK
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20130510/90d07c49/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list