[ExI] WSJ Article: "In Defense of CO2"

Tomaz Kristan protokol2020 at gmail.com
Fri May 10 14:59:20 UTC 2013

> There is plenty to read if you want to.

I know. It is even more elsewhere. But I am picky and I don't read just
everything. Especially not various cult literature.

But I would read, if you could paste from somewhere or link why the WSJ
article is wrong about CO2 - H20 relation at photosynthesis. (Poor dying
black/white bear does not interest me in this context.)

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:02 PM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Tomaz Kristan wrote:
> > I've failed to see any "horrendous effects" of those, I am very sorry.
> Show
> > me just one!
> >
> Sorry, but I'm not getting into a 'he said' v 'she said' global
> warming argument.
> There is plenty to read if you want to.
> The referenced article is a good start.
> <
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/05/10/carbon_dioxide_and_global_warming_more_is_not_better.html
> >
> BillK
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20130510/21b51797/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list