[ExI] Whatever happened to peak oil by 2020?
Tomaz Kristan
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Mon May 13 12:35:37 UTC 2013
> I have absolutely no further interest in this thread.
I guess, you have been cornered, that's why.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:43:18PM -0400, Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The reasons are simple enough -- peak total fossil is somewhen
> 2020..2030
> > > (the exact decade doesn't matter), so everything needs to be driven
> > > from renewable only.
> >
> > ### Absolutely no reason for peak total fossil at least for a hundred
> > years, if not more. Proven reserves alone are sufficient for that
> > long, even without counting methane clathrates. Try wikipedia.
>
> The facts you're claiming are unfortunately not true.
>
> > And absolutely no need to be restricted to renewables. Existing
> > technologies alone (nuclear, deep geothermal) are sufficient to keep
> > us running at current levels for thousands of years. Again, try
> > wikipedia.
>
> The facts you're claiming are unfortunately not true.
>
> I have absolutely no further interest in this thread.
> The facts are out there, make of them what you will.
> If you don't feel you need facts for that, I'm fine with that, too.
> You pays your money, and you takes your chances.
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20130513/2bd15090/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list