[ExI] kepler study says 8.8e9 earthlike planets

John Clark johnkclark at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 16:49:25 UTC 2013


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Kelly Anderson <kellycoinguy at gmail.com>wrote:

> While it is possible to evolve very good tentacles underwater, nothing
> like hands has evolved underwater. Part of the problem is that water tends
> to evolve creatures that are streamlined. Hands, are clearly not very
> streamlined. Could tentacles lead to intelligence? Perhaps. But without
> high rates of speciation, it would take much longer in the ocean than on
> land.
>

I think it would be almost impossible for sea creatures, however smart they
were, to develop technology. The laws of Newtonian Physics were hard enough
to discover for humans who lived in a atmosphere not in a vacuum, but it
would be astronomically harder under water; there things NEVER move at the
same speed unless a force is constantly applied, and intelligent fish
wouldn't have the motions of the stars and planets to help them figure out
basic physics. Even humans would never have discovered Quantum Mechanics if
they hadn't figured out a way to make a vacuum first.  And intelligent fish
would lack one of the first and most important inventions, fire.

  John K Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20131113/dcdd242a/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list