[ExI] [tp] Thiel, Anissimov and Neo-reactionary Monarchism

BillK pharos at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 18:35:31 UTC 2013


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, spike wrote:
> Ja, that is what I concluded too Anders.  The article felt like it carried
> the unstated assumption that world socialism is the future, therefore anyone
> who isn't for world socialism must be reactionary.  I have read Peter
> Thiel's comments and attended his lectures; I can calmly assure you that man
> is anything but reactionary.  He has a crystal clear view of the future.
>
> In some ways we could argue that socialists are the reactionaries. Margaret
> Thatcher has so eloquently identified its shortcoming: it works fine until
> they run out of other people's money.
>


Can't the socialists just keep printing trillions as required, like
the US does????

;)

BillK



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list