[ExI] To Boldly Go Nowhere, for Now
eugen at leitl.org
Fri Sep 20 14:05:02 UTC 2013
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:57:10PM +0100, BillK wrote:
> NASA have researched alternatives to Pu-238 and rejected them.
If you want it the RTG way, and you run into supply bottleneck,
then perhaps it's wise to diversify your options.
> I understand there is much opposition to launching nuclear reactors,
> ;) and scientists have worried about radiation damage to instruments.
> (Heavy shielding not allowed in rocket launches).
The Russians flew several of these in LEO. In general, a long boom
and a little shielding goes a long way.
> And I don't think TOPAZ actually exists nowadays.
I have little doubt that the Russians will unmothball the program
for a little money.
However, if you want to develop the inner solar system, up to Mars,
then PV is perfectly adequate. Even for propulsion, InP on capton
gives you 3 kW/kg. Half that at Mars.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the extropy-chat